Regarding "Enpai" and "Aopai," please refer to "Western medicine" and "Traditional Chinese medicine."
Objective laws do not change according to human will. Regardless of which school of thought is praised, regardless of what policies are used, whether delaying the trough or advancing the peak, a law is a law. If there is a so-called effective panacea, if there are universally applicable policies, then it becomes sentimental, approaching idealism, and deviating from the fundamentals of economics—rationality.
From ancient times to the present, there has been no method that can completely transform the economic cycle (similar to a sine wave), with its ups and downs, into a manipulable and desired "straight line."
Whether a method is effective, in my opinion, depends on whether it is "assisting the operation of laws" or "interfering with the operation of laws." This is also the biggest difference between Traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine.
Keynesianism resembles a "celebration of a group of people," more like a "national Ponzi scheme," and more like a "delusion of an endless game of passing the parcel." In other words, this is "subjective law."
I believe that, similar to individual competition, there is a certain degree of competition between nations. When everyone is trying to boost the economy and increase GDP, wasting efforts to solve fundamentally unsolvable problems, while "pretending to work hard," you alone remain sober, telling the people, "Everyone should stay calm; this is a law! This is a law! None of us can do anything about it, and it will often occur in the future; everyone should get used to it." No citizen would believe such a government. In any democratic country, the current government would surely be overthrown and despised by millions of voters. (People only believe what they want to believe and see what they want to see.) You just need to know that behind various complex events, they are caused by these two opposing laws.
Looking at it in a practical way, it's like students; everyone is working hard, staying up late, and desperately preparing for exams, while you have already seen the "essence of learning," striving to acquire skills for yourself rather than just coping with exams. In that case, everyone will exclude you. It's like girls losing weight; what is beauty? Who sets the standards for beauty? Does beauty have to mean being thin? This is the subjective law. When everyone believes that A is correct, even if B is the right answer, the role of B becomes a counteraction. This is the dialectic of objective law and subjective law.
In summary:
"No one should delude themselves into thinking they can change objective laws or even rise above them. Any behavior that despises objective laws will bring about a backlash a thousandfold."